【Machine Learning】Other Stuff

这篇具有很好参考价值的文章主要介绍了【Machine Learning】Other Stuff。希望对大家有所帮助。如果存在错误或未考虑完全的地方,请大家不吝赐教,您也可以点击"举报违法"按钮提交疑问。

本笔记基于清华大学《机器学习》的课程讲义中有关机器学习的此前未提到的部分,基本为笔者在考试前一两天所作的Cheat Sheet。内容较多,并不详细,主要作为复习和记忆的资料。

Robust Machine Learning

Attack: PGD

  • max ⁡ δ ∈ Δ L o s s ( f θ ( x + δ ) , y ) \max_{\delta\in \Delta}Loss(f_\theta(x+\delta),y) maxδΔLoss(fθ(x+δ),y): find δ \delta δ that maximizes the loss
  • How to compute δ \delta δ?
    • Projected Gradient Descent: GD then project back to Δ \Delta Δ
    • Fast Gradient Sign Method: For example, Δ = { δ : ∣ δ ∣ ∞ ≤ ϵ } \Delta =\{\delta:|\delta|_\infty\le \epsilon\} Δ={δ:δϵ}. Then as learning rate goes to ∞ \infty , we always go to corner. Then δ = η ⋅ s i g n ( ∇ x L θ ( x + δ t , y ) ) \delta=\eta\cdot sign(\nabla_xL_\theta(x+\delta_t,y)) δ=ηsign(xLθ(x+δt,y)), we only take the sign.
    • PGD: runs FGSM multiple times.

Defend: Adversarial Training

  • Daskin’s Theorem:
    ∂ ∂ θ max ⁡ δ L ( f θ ( x + δ , y ) ) = ∂ ∂ θ L ( f θ ( x + δ ∗ , y ) ) \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta }\max_\delta L(f_\theta(x+\delta,y))=\frac{\partial }{\partial \theta}L(f_\theta(x+\delta^*,y)) θδmaxL(fθ(x+δ,y))=θL(fθ(x+δ,y))
    Only care about the worst attack samples. For a batch of samples, find δ ∗ \delta^* δ, then do GD on θ \theta θ based on δ ∗ \delta^* δ.

  • Models become more semantically meaningful by adversarial training

Robust Feature Learning

  • For a dog photo x x x, attack it to x ′ x' x, so that f ( x ′ ) = c a t f(x')=cat f(x)=cat. This ( x ′ , c a t ) (x',cat) (x,cat) training set gives model the “non-robust” features.
  • For train image x x x, generate from random initialization x τ x_\tau xτ such that g ( x ) ≈ g ( x τ ) g(x)\approx g(x_\tau) g(x)g(xτ). x τ x_\tau xτ is also a good training sample that gives similar robust feature to the model.

False Sense of Security

  • Backward pass differentiable approximation(ignore the gradient that is hard to compute).
  • Take multiple samples to solve the randomness.

Provable Robust Certificates

  • Classification problem: use histogram, pick the largest color nearby.
  • Compare the histogram centered at x x x and x + δ x+\delta x+δ:
    • Worst case: Greedy filling(*)

Hyperparameter

Bayesian Optimization

  • estimate the parameters as Gaussian.
  • explore both the great-variance point and the low point.

Gradient descent

  • Directly use GD to find hyperparameter: memory storage problem
  • SGD with momentum: v t + 1 = γ t v t − ( 1 − γ t ) ∇ w L ( w t , θ , t ) v_{t+1}=\gamma_tv_t-(1-\gamma_t)\nabla _wL(w_t,\theta ,t) vt+1=γtvt(1γt)wL(wt,θ,t)
    • Store w t + 1 , v t + 1 w_{t+1},v_{t+1} wt+1,vt+1 and ∇ w L ( w t , θ , t ) \nabla _wL(w_t,\theta,t) wL(wt,θ,t), we can recover the whole chain
  • Need: Continuous

Random Search

  • Work better than grid search

Best Arm identification

  • Successive Halving(SH) Algorithm(*)

    • Per round use B / log ⁡ 2 ( n ) B/\log_2(n) B/log2(n), log ⁡ 2 ( n ) \log_2(n) log2(n) rounds totally.
    • Each round, every survivor use the same budget. Only half of them survive in each round.
  • Assume v 1 > v 2 ≥ . . . ≥ v n , Δ i = v 1 − v i v_1>v_2\ge ...\ge v_n,\Delta_i=v_1-v_i v1>v2...vn,Δi=v1vi. With probability 1 − δ 1-\delta 1δ, the algorithm finds the best arm with B = O ( max ⁡ i > 1 i Δ i 2 log ⁡ n log ⁡ ( log ⁡ n / δ ) ) B=O(\max_{i>1}\frac{i}{\Delta_i^2}\log n\log(\log n/\delta)) B=O(maxi>1Δi2ilognlog(logn/δ)) assuming v i ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] v_i\in [0,1] vi[0,1]

    • Proof. Concentration inequaility, probability that 1 3 \frac{1}{3} 31 of 3 4 N r \frac{3}{4}N_r 43Nr smaller ones are greater than best one is bounded, union bound for all round.
  • Hyperparameter tuning

    • B ≥ 2 log ⁡ 2 ( n ) ( n + ∑ i = 2... n γ ˉ − 1 ( v i − v 1 2 ) ) B\ge 2\log_2(n)\left(n+\sum_{i=2...n}\bar{\gamma}^{-1}(\frac{v_i-v_1}{2})\right) B2log2(n)(n+i=2...nγˉ1(2viv1))

Neural Architecture Search

  • Reinforcement learning
  • ProxylessNAS: each architecture has weight α i \alpha_i αi to be chosen. Choose a binary variable, that is only one architecture exists, and the probability is about α i \alpha_i αi. ∂ L ∂ α i ≈ ∂ L ∂ g i ∂ p i ∂ α i \frac{\partial L}{\partial \alpha_i}\approx\frac{\partial L}{\partial g_i}\frac{\partial p_i}{\partial \alpha_i} αiLgiLαipi, g i = 0 / 1 g_i=0/1 gi=0/1, ∂ L / ∂ g j \partial L/\partial g_j L/gj means the influence of architecture j j j to L L L.

Machine Learning Augmented

Differencial Privacy

  • Randomness is essential.

    • If we have a non-trivial deterministic algorithm, we can change data base A A A to B B B one by one until their output is the same. There exists a pair of databases differ by one row, then we know about that row.
  • Database: histogram N ∣ X ∣ N^{|X|} NX for discrete set X X X(the categories).

  • M M M is ( ϵ , δ ) (\epsilon,\delta ) (ϵ,δ)-differentially privacy if ∀ x , y ∈ N ∣ X ∣ , ∣ x − y ∣ 1 ≤ 1 , S ⊆ M ( N ∣ X ∣ ) \forall x,y\in N^{|X|},|x-y|_1\le 1,S\subseteq M(N^{|X|}) x,yNX,xy11,SM(NX)
    P ( M ( x ) ∈ S ) ≤ e ϵ P ( M ( y ) ∈ S ) + δ P(M(x)\in S)\le e^{\epsilon}P(M(y)\in S)+\delta P(M(x)S)eϵP(M(y)S)+δ

  • Differencial privacy is immune to post-processing. Proof:

    • For deterministic function: Proved easily by inverse function
    • Random function is convex combination of deterministic function, that is, each deterministic function is chosen with some probability.
  • With ( ϵ , 0 ) (\epsilon,0) (ϵ,0)-differential privacy(DP mechanism), the voting result will not change too much by changing one’s vote.
    E a ∼ f ( M ( x ) ) [ u i ( a ) ] = ∑ a ∈ A u i ( a ) Pr ⁡ f ( M ( x ) ) [ a ] ≤ ∑ a ∈ A u i ( a ) exp ⁡ ( ϵ ) Pr ⁡ f ( M ( y ) ) [ a ] = exp ⁡ ( ϵ ) E a ∼ f ( M ( y ) ) [ u i ( a ) ] \begin{align*} E_{a\sim f(M(x))}[u_i(a)]&=\sum_{a\in A} u_i(a)\Pr_{f(M(x))}[a]\\&\le \sum_{a\in A}u_i(a)\exp(\epsilon)\Pr_{f(M(y))}[a]\\&=\exp(\epsilon)E_{a\sim f(M(y))}[u_i(a)] \end{align*} Eaf(M(x))[ui(a)]=aAui(a)f(M(x))Pr[a]aAui(a)exp(ϵ)f(M(y))Pr[a]=exp(ϵ)Eaf(M(y))[ui(a)]
    f f f is a map to the feature, and we only consider the expected voting utility u i ( a ) u_i(a) ui(a) about the feature a a a.

  • Laplace Mechanism: reach ( ϵ , 0 ) (\epsilon,0) (ϵ,0)-DP by just adding a random gaussian noise to f ( x ) , x ∈ N ∣ X ∣ f(x),x\in N^{|X|} f(x),xNX

    • Assume f : N ∣ X ∣ → R k f:N^{|X|}\to \R^{k} f:NXRk

    • Definition: M L ( x , f , ϵ ) = f ( x ) + ( Y 1 , . . , Y k ) M_L(x,f,\epsilon)=f(x)+(Y_1,..,Y_k) ML(x,f,ϵ)=f(x)+(Y1,..,Yk)

      • Y i Y_i Yi is iid random variable from L a p ( Δ f ϵ ) Lap(\frac{\Delta f }{\epsilon}) Lap(ϵΔf)
      • l 1 l_1 l1 sensitive of f f f is Δ f = max ⁡ x , y , ∣ x − y ∣ 1 ≤ 1 ∣ f ( x ) − f ( y ) ∣ 1 \Delta f=\max_{x,y,|x-y|_1\le 1}|f(x)-f(y)|_1 Δf=maxx,y,xy11f(x)f(y)1. How sensitive f f f is by changing one entry a little.
      • Probability density: L a p ( b ) = 1 2 b exp ⁡ ( − ∣ x ∣ b ) Lap(b)=\frac{1}{2b}\exp(-\frac{|x|}{b}) Lap(b)=2b1exp(bx). Variance σ 2 = 2 b 2 \sigma^2=2b^2 σ2=2b2.
    • Proof. The probability density of M L ( x , f , ϵ ) M_L(x,f,\epsilon) ML(x,f,ϵ) is p x ( z ) = ∏ i = 1 k exp ⁡ ( − ϵ ∣ f ( x ) i − z i ∣ Δ f ) p_x(z)=\prod_{i=1}^k\exp\left(-\frac{\epsilon|f(x)_i-z_i|}{\Delta f}\right) px(z)=i=1kexp(Δfϵf(x)izi). Easily prove p x ( z ) / p y ( z ) ≤ exp ⁡ ( ϵ ) p_x(z)/p_y(z)\le \exp(\epsilon) px(z)/py(z)exp(ϵ)

    • Accuracy: for δ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] \delta\in(0,1] δ(0,1],
      Pr ⁡ [ ∣ f ( x ) − M L ( x , f , ϵ ) ∣ ∞ ≥ ln ⁡ ( k δ ) ⋅ ( Δ f ϵ ) ] ≤ δ \Pr\left[|f(x)-M_L(x,f,\epsilon)|_\infty\ge \ln\left(\frac{k}{\delta}\right)\cdot \left(\frac{\Delta f}{\epsilon}\right)\right]\le \delta Pr[f(x)ML(x,f,ϵ)ln(δk)(ϵΔf)]δ文章来源地址https://www.toymoban.com/news/detail-808456.html

      • Directly prove by Pr ⁡ [ ∣ Y ∣ ≥ t ⋅ b ] = exp ⁡ ( − t ) \Pr[|Y|\ge t\cdot b]=\exp(-t) Pr[Ytb]=exp(t) for Y ∼ L a p ( b ) Y\sim Lap(b) YLap(b)

Big data

  • Idea: data distribution rarely changes.
  • Replace B-tree with a model. Know err_min err_max because you only care about the data in your database
    • advantage: less storage, faster lookups, more parallelism, hardware accelators
    • use linear model(fast)
    • Do exponential search since the prediction is good enough
    • Bloom Filter: is the key in my set=>maybe yes/no

Low Rank Apporximation

  • A ∈ R n × m A\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times m} ARn×m, [ A ] k = arg ⁡ min ⁡ r a n k ( A ′ ) ≤ k ∣ A − A ′ ∣ F [A]_k=\arg \min_{rank(A')\le k} |A-A'|_F [A]k=argminrank(A)kAAF
  • Learn S ∈ R p × m S\in \mathbb{R}^{p\times m} SRp×m and do low rank decomposition for S A SA SA, then do some recover.

Recified flow

  • Given empirical observations about distribution π 0 \pi_0 π0 and π 1 \pi_1 π1. Find a transport map T T T that T ( Z ) ∼ π 1 T(Z)\sim \pi_1 T(Z)π1 for Z ∼ π 0 Z\sim \pi_0 Zπ0.
    • E.g. π 0 \pi_0 π0 is gaussian noise, π 1 \pi_1 π1 are data containing pictures. We want to find a map from noise to picture(diffusion) that has some features.
    • If T ( X 0 ) = X 1 T(X_0)=X_1 T(X0)=X1, then we want v ( t X 0 + ( 1 − t ) X 1 , t ) = d X d t = X 1 − X 0 v(tX_0+(1-t)X_1,t)=\frac{dX}{dt}=X_1-X_0 v(tX0+(1t)X1,t)=dtdX=X1X0. The transformation is linear. So that one cluster will map to another clusters.
    • Minimize the loss E [ ∥ ( X 1 − X 0 ) − v ( X t , t ) ∥ 2 ] \mathbb{E}[\|(X_1-X_0)-v(X_t,t)\|^2] E[(X1X0)v(Xt,t)2]
  • Algorithm:
    • randomly connect π 0 , π 1 \pi_0,\pi_1 π0,π1
    • minimize loss of $\theta $ for v θ v_\theta vθ
    • connect π 0 , π 1 \pi_0,\pi_1 π0,π1 by v θ v_\theta vθ again, and repeat minimization.

Rope Attention

  • Embed position to q m , k n q_m,k_n qm,kn for attention by rotation in complex field
    • β \beta β-base system: focus on different accuracy level
  • use inner product of q m , k n q_m,k_n qm,kn to represent their similarity
  • Softmax attention Attention ( Q , K , V ) = softmax ( Q K ⊤ ) V \text{Attention}(Q,K,V)=\text{softmax}(QK^\top)V Attention(Q,K,V)=softmax(QK)V
  • Faster computation
    • linear
    • softmax separately
    • design Q K ⊤ QK^\top QK

到了这里,关于【Machine Learning】Other Stuff的文章就介绍完了。如果您还想了解更多内容,请在右上角搜索TOY模板网以前的文章或继续浏览下面的相关文章,希望大家以后多多支持TOY模板网!

本文来自互联网用户投稿,该文观点仅代表作者本人,不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如若转载,请注明出处: 如若内容造成侵权/违法违规/事实不符,请点击违法举报进行投诉反馈,一经查实,立即删除!

领支付宝红包 赞助服务器费用

相关文章

  • 应用机器学习的建议 (Advice for Applying Machine Learning)

    问题: 假如,在你得到你的学习参数以后,如果你要将你的假设函数放到一组 新的房屋样本上进行测试,假如说你发现在预测房价时产生了巨大的误差,现在你的问题是要想改进这个算法,接下来应该怎么办? 解决思路: 一种办法是使用更多的训练样本。具体来讲,也许你

    2024年01月25日
    浏览(43)
  • 现实生活中机器学习的具体示例(Machine Learning 研习之二)

    机器学习在现实中的示例 通过上一篇的讲解,我们多多少少对 机器学习 (Machine Learning)有了些许了解,同时也对 机器学习 (Machine Learning)一词不再那么抗拒了。 那么, 机器学习 到底在现实生活为我们解决哪些难题呢?亦或是传统方案目前无法实现的。 1、可以分析生产

    2024年02月16日
    浏览(42)
  • 机器学习在网络安全领域的应用 Demystifying Cybersecurity with Machine Learning

    作者:禅与计算机程序设计艺术 什么是机器学习(Machine Learning)?又是如何应用在网络安全领域呢?本文将详细阐述其定义、分类及历史沿革,同时介绍一些机器学习的基本概念和技术,帮助企业界更好地理解和掌握机器学习在网络安全领域的应用。通过相关案例实践,全

    2024年02月06日
    浏览(42)
  • Azure Machine Learning - 聊天机器人构建

    本文介绍如何部署和运行适用于 Python 的企业聊天应用示例。 此示例使用 Python、Azure OpenAI 服务和 Azure AI 搜索中的检索扩充生成(RAG)实现聊天应用,以获取虚构公司员工福利的解答。 关注TechLead,分享AI全维度知识。作者拥有10+年互联网服务架构、AI产品研发经验、团队管理

    2024年01月19日
    浏览(51)
  • [machine Learning]强化学习

    强化学习和前面提到的几种预测模型都不一样,reinforcement learning更多时候使用在控制一些东西上,在算法的本质上很接近我们曾经学过的DFS求最短路径. 强化学习经常用在一些游戏ai的训练,以及一些比如火星登陆器,月球登陆器等等工程领域,强化学习的内容很简单,本质就是获取

    2024年02月09日
    浏览(41)
  • [Machine Learning] 领域适应和迁移学习

    在机器学习中,我们的目标是找到一个假设或模型,它可以很好地描述或预测数据。当我们基于训练集训练模型时,我们的目的是让模型能够捕获到数据中的主要模式。然而,为了确保模型不仅仅是对训练数据进行记忆,而是真正理解了数据的结构,我们需要在测试集上评估

    2024年02月08日
    浏览(54)
  • 【Machine Learning 系列】一文带你详解什么是强化学习(Reinforcement Learning)

    机器学习主要分为三类:有监督学习、无监督学习和强化学习。在本文中,我们将介绍强化学习(Reinforcement Learning)的原理、常见算法和应用领域。 强化学习(Reinforcement Learning)是机器学习中一种重要的学习范式,其目标是通过与环境的交互来学习如何做出最优的决策。 强化

    2024年02月14日
    浏览(50)
  • [Machine Learning][Part 8]神经网络的学习训练过程

    目录 训练过程 一、建立模型: 二、建立损失函数 J(w,b): 三、寻找最小损失函数的(w,b)组合 为什么需要激活函数  激活函数种类 二分法逻辑回归模型 线性回归模型 回归模型 根据需求建立模型,从前面神经网络的结果可以知道,每一层都有若干个模型在运行,因此建立神经网

    2024年02月05日
    浏览(48)
  • (转载)极限学习机(extreme learning machine, ELM)的回归拟合及分类(matlab实现)

            单隐含层前馈神经网络(single-hidden layer feedforward neural network,SLFN)以其良好的学习能力在许多领域中得到了广泛的应用。然而,传统的学习算法(如BP算法等)固有的一些缺点,成为制约其发展的主要瓶颈。前馈神经网络大多采用梯度下降方法,该方法主要存在以下几个

    2024年02月13日
    浏览(43)
  • 【Machine Learning】Supervised Learning

    本笔记基于清华大学《机器学习》的课程讲义监督学习相关部分,基本为笔者在考试前一两天所作的Cheat Sheet。内容较多,并不详细,主要作为复习和记忆的资料。 f ( x ) = s i g n ( w ⊤ x + b ) f(x)=sign(w^top x+b) f ( x ) = s i g n ( w ⊤ x + b ) convergence output probability instead of labels. Loss

    2024年01月20日
    浏览(45)

觉得文章有用就打赏一下文章作者

支付宝扫一扫打赏

博客赞助

微信扫一扫打赏

请作者喝杯咖啡吧~博客赞助

支付宝扫一扫领取红包,优惠每天领

二维码1

领取红包

二维码2

领红包